Tax penalties imposed lead to rejection of migrant sponsor licence

Posted on 3rd January, 2016

Estimated reading time 3 minutes

In the first case of its type, an employer has challenged the fact that their sponsor licence was rejected in court on the basis of tax penalties they had suffered, and lost their case.

Dutch employers are obliged to register as a recognised sponsor if they wish to hire employees from outside the EU, EEA or Switzerland under the highly skilled migrant program.  Only recognised sponsors may then use the accelerated application procedure to speed up their recruitment cycle.  Employers must be considered as reliable by the Immigration and Naturalization Services (“IND”) to be accepted for a sponsor licence, and as part of this process the IND checks whether any tax penalties have been imposed against the company.

In this case the highest Administrative Court agreed with the IND’s rejection of a request from an employer to become a recognised sponsor.  The reason for the rejection was that the tax authorities had previously held the employer responsible for incorrectly paying cost allowances tax free over three consecutive years when they should have been taxable, and had subsequently imposed additional wage tax assessments inclusive of penalties for the same offence.  

What does this mean?

Dutch employers planning on applying for a sponsor licence need to be mindful that one of the criteria for approving their application will be tax compliance.  In this case the employer must now wait for four years from the date at which the tax penalty was imposed to reapply for a sponsor licence.

Without the status of recognised sponsor, an employer cannot apply for a residence permit as a highly skilled migrant on behalf of his employees, and will need to use the normal process which is more cumbersome and lengthy.

What should employers do?

It is not uncommon for wage tax penalties to be imposed as a result of a tax audit and employers should review their pay and benefits arrangements to ensure that they would be deemed compliant.  

Further information

For further information or to discuss any of the issues raised, please contact Wendy Terporten on +31 10 224 64 34, Loyens & Loeff Netherlands.

Further reading

Ruling 201502719/1 / V1 (Dutch)


Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

Circular 230 disclosure

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this article (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.