Dutch employee not required to pay Dutch tax for money earned in Germany

Posted on 9th January, 2014
 | 

Estimated reading time 3 minutes

Following a ruling by the Dutch Court in May 2014, a Dutch employee has been granted tax relief for income he earned in Germany.

Germany was the 'economic employer'

In 2011, an employee of a Dutch company was seconded to a German group company for a period of 55 days, due to a shortage of personnel within the German company.  The employee applied for tax relief in his Dutch income tax return against the income he earned in Germany to avoid paying double tax on the amount.

Although the employee did not satisfy the conditions of the German-Dutch tax treaty (that he was working in Germany for more than 183 days during the tax year, or was paid by an employer resident in Germany), he was entitled to relief for double taxation because the German company was deemed to be his ‘economic’ employer for the 55 day period.

Despite the Dutch company continuing to be the employee’s ‘formal’ employer and to pay his salary, the German company was seen to be the economic employer on a number of grounds: there was a relationship of authority with the German company, the work performed was part of the German company’s normal activities and the activities were performed for the risk and on account of the German company.  In addition, all the employee’s costs were recharged to the German company by the Dutch employer.

Commentary

Whilst the application for tax relief remains the responsibility of the individual employee, HR departments should be made aware of this ruling, which could impact other Dutch employees who work in Germany.

Resources

Judgement of the Court of Zeeland West Brabant dated 21.05.2014 (in Dutch language)

For further information or to discuss the consequences of the above, please contact Rina Driece, on +31 10 224 6 424 at Loyens & Loeff Rotterdam – www.loyensloeff.com

Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

Circular 230 disclosure

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this article (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Copying

If you would like to copy or otherwise reproduce this article then you may do so provided that: (1) any such copy or reproduction is for your own personal use or if it is made available to any third party it is done so on a free of charge basis; and (2) the article is reproduced in full together with the contact details, disclaimer and any logos as they appear on each article.