Limitation period for personal injury limits employers’ exposure to claims

January 4, 2011

An important decision of the Federal Supreme Court confirms that the limitation period for personal injury claims for breach of contractual duty claims run from the date of the breach.

The case

The plaintiff worked  from 1962 as a turbine installer and from 1978 as an in-house turbine technician.  He claimed to have come intensively into contact with asbestos between 1966 and 1978. In 2004 he was diagnosed with a malignant lung cancer, which led to his death in 2005.  Thereafter, his two surviving daughters continued the lawsuit.  The lower courts rejected the liability claim and consequently the matter had to be judged by the Federal Supreme Court, which, however, also dismissed the claim.

Federal Supreme Court’s decision

According to the practice of the Federal Supreme Court, claims for compensation for personal injury at work arise at the moment of the breach of the relevant contractual duty giving rise to the damage.  Consequently, the limitation period starts at that moment (art. 130 of the Swiss Code of Obligations).  A minority of legal commentators are of the opinion that the ordinary statute of limitation of ten years (art. 127 of the Swiss Code of Obligations) should start when the damage complained of first occurs –which in this case when the symptoms of the cancer first arose.  However, the Federal Supreme Court confirmed its previous practice.  The court referred to the ability for special regulations to be made under relevant legislation for the limitation period to expire after a longer period where there is a latent damage claim dependant on the outbreak of an illness or disease.  It noted that the legislator had not chosen to pass such regulations to cover the type of illness or the circumstances which caused the death of the claimant.  However, for example, such regulations have been passed to apply to diseases and illnesses caused by nuclear radiation.

Resources

Decision of the Federal Supreme Court 4A_249/2010 of November 16, 2010

For further information or to discuss any of the issues raised, please contact Walter H. Boss or Thomas G. Albert on +41 44 220 12 12

Category:

CELIA Alliance
CELIA Alliance members are identified here. Members of the CELIA Alliance are each independent law firms and do not practice law jointly with any other member of the CELIA Alliance. “CELIA Alliance” and “CELIA” are not trading names. For more information about the CELIA Alliance click here.

Disclaimer
Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this newsletter. For further legal information click here.

Copying
If you would like to copy or otherwise reproduce this article then you may do so provided that: (1) any such copy or reproduction is for your own personal use or if it is made available to any third party it is done so on a free of charge basis; and (2) the article is reproduced in full together with the contact details, disclaimer and any logos as they appear on each article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *