Germany: employer fined for spying on sick employee
A German employer who hired a private detective to check whether a sick employee was really unfit for work has been fined for violating the employee’s human rights. After the ruling by the German Federal Labour Court, the employee was awarded compensation of €1,000 for immaterial damage – significantly less than the €10,500 initially claimed.
The case involved a female employee who had reported sick for about two months, initially due to bronchial disease and then later because of a slipped disc. During her absence she submitted six certificates of incapacity for work from two different doctors (the first a general practitioner, the second a medical specialist). After she reported a slipped disc, the employer assumed the employee had feigned her illness and hired a private detective to observe the employee. Despite observing the employee for around two weeks, the private detective was unable to provide conclusive evidence that the injury was simulated.
In awarding compensation to the employee, the Federal Court ruled that observation of an employee by a private detective is illegal when the employer’s suspicion is not based on concrete evidence of a breach of duty. As such, the illegal observation is a violation of the employee’s human rights and justifies compensation for immaterial damage. However, as the observation was classified as ‘normal’ by the Court, compensation of €1,000 was deemed to be adequate.
- Date of the decision: 19/02/2015, file reference: 8 AZR 1007/13
- Federal Labour Court decision
For further information or to discuss any of the issues raised, please contact Stefanie.Andrelang@Keller-Menz.de on +49 89 2422300.
Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information see our legal page.
Circular 230 disclosure
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this article (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
If you would like to copy or otherwise reproduce this article then you may do so provided that: (1) any such copy or reproduction is for your own personal use or if it is made available to any third party it is done so on a free of charge basis; and (2) the article is reproduced in full together with the contact details, disclaimer and any logos as they appear on each article.