Compensation & Benefits: Amendment to AIM rules to now require disclosure of directors’ remuneration

January 3, 2010

On 15 December 2009, the London Stock Exchange published AIM Notice
35, detailing proposed amendments to the AIM Rules. On 17 February 2010,
AIM Notice 36 was published with a new version of the AIM Rules, which
are effective from this date

It was proposed that AIM Rule 19 should be amended to require an AIM
company to disclose details of each director’s remuneration in its
annual audited accounts.  AIM Notice 36 sets out details of the
consultation on the proposed amendments under AIM Notice 35 and confirms
that these will be made.

Present position

An AIM company must publish annual audited accounts which must be
sent to its shareholders not later than six months after the end of the
financial year to which they relate.

Currently disclosure of directors’ remuneration is not a
requirement.  AIM Rule 19 only requires disclosure of certain
transactions with related parties.

Proposed disclosure

Details required to be disclosed will include:

Disclosure will be required for each director of the AIM company.


The amendment to AIM Rule 19 will bring AIM listed companies in line
with the disclosure and reporting obligations set out in the Companies
Act 2006 and which currently apply only to UK companies quoted on the
official list of the UKLA.

Although the amendment will be more onerous for AIM companies than
the current requirements, the amendment is logical, and therefore not
entirely unexpected, in light of the increasing focus on corporate
governance and the area of remuneration in particular.

The new disclosure of directors’ remuneration requirement under Rule
19 will apply to AIM companies with financial years ending on, or
after, 31 March 2010.


Notice 35

Notice 36

AIM Rules

For further information or to discuss the issues
raised, please contact Guy Abbiss (
or Libs Davies (
on +44 (0) 203 051 5711.


CELIA Alliance
CELIA Alliance members are identified here. Members of the CELIA Alliance are each independent law firms and do not practice law jointly with any other member of the CELIA Alliance. “CELIA Alliance” and “CELIA” are not trading names. For more information about the CELIA Alliance click here.

Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this newsletter. For further legal information click here.

If you would like to copy or otherwise reproduce this article then you may do so provided that: (1) any such copy or reproduction is for your own personal use or if it is made available to any third party it is done so on a free of charge basis; and (2) the article is reproduced in full together with the contact details, disclaimer and any logos as they appear on each article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *