News - Switzerland

Switzerland - May 2013

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court rules that bonuses for high earners can be subject to forfeiture

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court has held that bonus payments to high earning employees should be treated as discretionary compensation with the result that a forfeiture enforceable.


The issue is whether a bonus payment qualifies as variable salary or as discretionary compensation. Swiss employment law does not explicitly make reference to bonus payments. Therefore, the answer has historically been determined by the Court on each case's facts by reference to case law.

The distinction between variable salary and discretionary compensation is important. This is because a bonus that qualifies as variable salary cannot be subject to a forfeiture clause. For example, where an employment is terminated before the end of the period over which the bonus is earned, the employee is entitled to receive an amount of variable salary on a pro rata basis. On the other hand, where a bonus is deemed to be discretionary compensation, no entitlement accrues and a forfeiture clause is enforceable.

The Courts have been conscious of the need to provide protection to employees in relation to their salary. Pursuant to the case law developed by the Federal Supreme Court any bonus payment that exceeds the total salary received by the employee from the employer is qualified as a salary component. This rule is referred to as the “accessory nature” of a bonus payment, meaning that a bonus payment must be “accessory” to the salary of the employee in order to be qualified as a discretionary bonus. This rule intends to grant the employee a salary protection and is socially motivated.

Where the bonus exceeds the total amount of compensation otherwise paid to the employee it is fully or partly considered to be a salary component and not "accessory" in nature.

The case in question

An employee at a Swiss bank was granted a deferred award subject to forfeiture in the event of the termination of the employment in addition to a high salary and a cash bonus of almost 2 million Swiss Francs. The employee terminated the employment and claimed that the portion of the deferred award forfeitable under the terms of the award, qualified as a salary component (and was not discretionary compensation). Accordingly, the forfeiture provision was not enforceable. The Federal Supreme Court, however, rejected his claim. Instead, it ruled that the deferred award was a discretionary bonus and that the forfeiture clause was valid.

The Court's view was that the case law developed with respect to the accessory nature of a bonus payment should no longer apply in the case of employees with very high salaries since in its view these employees do not need the protection offered by the Court.

Thus, if, for example, an employee's salary far exceeds the amount required to cover his/her reasonable living costs, the bonus payment may still be a discretionary bonus (with the result that a forfeiture clause is enforceable) regardless of the ratio between the fixed salary and the bonus.


In the light of this ruling, employers are well advised to obtain legal advice in relation to the drafting of bonus plans.


Decision of the Federal Supreme Court of February 26, 2013; 4C_520/2012.

For further information or to discuss any of the issues raised, please contact Walter H. Boss or Stefanie Monge on +41 44 220 1212 at Poledna Boss Kurer, Zurich -


Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

Circular 230 disclosure

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this article (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.


If you would like to copy or otherwise reproduce this article then you may do so provided that: (1) any such copy or reproduction is for your own personal use or if it is made available to any third party it is done so on a free of charge basis; and (2) the article is reproduced in full together with the contact details, disclaimer and any logos as they appear on each article.